Fast, FREE Shipping with Amazon Prime Sold by American Sports Products and Fulfilled by Amazon. Fulfillment by Amazon (FBA) is a service we offer sellers that lets them store their products in Amazon's fulfillment centers, and we directly pack, ship, and provide customer service for these products. Something we hope you'll especially enjoy: FBA items qualify for FREE Shipping and . If you're a seller, Fulfillment by Amazon can help you increase your sales. We invite you to learn more about Fulfillment by Amazon New (1) from $54.95 Bushwhacker® Moab Black - Bicycle Rear / Front Pannier Cycling Rack Pack Bike Bag - w/ Reflective Trim - Sold as PairDetailsBushwhacker® Mesa Trunk Bag Black - w/ Rear Light Clip Attachment & Reflective Trim - Bicycle Trunk… FREE Shipping on orders over . DetailsBushwhacker Durango Black - Bicycle Handlebar Bag Cycling Front Pack Bike Bag Rear Frame Accessories FREE Shipping on orders over . The large-capacity main compartment of the Moab features covered zippers and adjustable compression straps.

Reflective trim increases visibility. Sold as a pair. Dimensions: 10.5" Length x 4" Width x 14.5" Height. Shipping Weight: 2.4 pounds (View shipping rates and policies) #218,055 in Sports & Outdoors (See Top 100 in Sports & Outdoors) in Sports & Outdoors > Outdoor Recreation > Cycling > Bike Racks & Bags > Panniers & Rack Trunks 5 star73%4 star25%3 star2%See all verified purchase reviewsTop Customer ReviewsTop Quality! Perfect for bike commutingLooking forward to commuting with these! Update - July 14, 2016Just what I was looking for Most Recent Customer ReviewsSearch Customer ReviewsBob Atkins , Aug 07, 1997; 06:44 p.m.Has anyone used a "Scopepack" to carry a long telephoto in theFor those who don't know what it is, it seems to be a basic "backpack", where the pack is a padded tube (24" x 8" I think), with a few small pockets on the side. Just wondering how effective it is (how well built, whether the harness is up to the job etc.). The advantage over a conventional photo backpack is that it's

cheap (under $100), the disadvantage I assume, is that you can't carry much more than a big telephoto plus a few supplies. GERRY KRUSCHENSKE , Aug 07, 1997; I purchased one this spring and used it for carrying my 500mm with 1.4 teleconverter + 52mm ext. tube with an F4e. high sierra backpack elevate laptop friendlyI also had the flash bracket by Really Right Stuff (Bryan Geyer)attached and although a snug fit with all this equipment , I find it to be a very usefull pack for photographing birds and wildlife. polaris rbs back pack coverMost of the time we carry too much in the field even though we might know that only the largest lens we own will be used. dslr travel backpack with laptop compartment nikon/crumpler

The 2 bottom pockets are padded and I put an extra camera body here as well as my Quantum Turbo battery. The other 2 pockets carry my flash and cables and extra batteries. I sometimes carry a light stand attached to the straps on the back of the pack. I find the pack is ideal for my use and compact when on the back. supreme 36th backpack sizeWith my gear mounted on my tripod, the pack is so light you hardley know it's on your back so I use it to carry my jacket or raincoat as the day warms up. madpax backpack cheapThe one I purchased is the new improved version and I can't compare with the old version as I haven't seen it. ogio rebel 15 laptop backpack reviewThe carrying straps are sturdy along with the waist belt which keeps the weight off the shoulders and onto the hips which makes a long hike much more relaxing.

The shell is made of re-inforced durable nylon with padding and seems quite strong and very water resistant. I can say that I am very happy to have one. (Note: this is not a payed advertisement!!!)Don Baccus , Aug 10, 1997; I don't own one - I own an external frame pack whose frame works well with enough parachute cord - but Portland Audubon, where I sit on the Board, carried them for awhile. Overkill for their first advertised use (scope + tripod), much better for a big 35mm gun if you can lash the tripod on, too. Plenty of protection, adjustment straps, and the like. If I didn't own so much other crap for lugging stuff around, I'd consider buying one.Bill Emmons , Aug 14, 1997; I own a Scopepack, and have found it uniquely handy for a specific purpose. The Scopepack is reasonably comfortable, does have a waist and chest belt, and four outside pockets, two lightly padded, that are large enough to carry almost everything you would need to shot with a long lens - extra film, filters, extenders, etc.

It is built well for the money - $85-100, but is a little too light and flimsy to really feel good about loading it and then dropping it in the back of a van. It will not stand up on its bottom with any real security. I used mine to hold a 400 f/2.8 with lens hood attached; this was a perfect fit, and did a nice job of serving as my "carry bag" and storage/ closet bag for this large lens. If you want to keep the hood extended on a longer lens, this is really the only way to go. That said, I told Saunders that I think many / most folks with longer glass would be glad to pay another $50 for a stouter bag, with a little better thought out pocket arrangement (all four pockets are just a little small for a larger body with vertical grip, or a 70/200 f/2.8 lens; another inch on two on these pockets would allow the Scopepack to be a one bag solution for someone shooting with one body mounted on a very big lens and another mounted on a mid-sized zoom. Saunders claimed they were listenting, and might modify this design sometime in the (presumably distant) future.

Duane Galensky , Aug 17, 1997; It's good for carrying a lens + camera attached with hood extended and ready to go. An additional layer of closed cell foam inside keeps my 500 a bit more snug. I had to modify mine a bit to beef up the velcro on the pockets...I was (and still am) afraid that all those supplies you mention would be strewn along the trail. But I wouldn't rely on it for travel. It does not close up securely enough in any dimension for my comfort in carrying ten thousand dollars worth of stuff on an airline, for example. Overall, I'd give it a six on a scale of ten.D. Robert Franz , Sep 19, 1997; I have the older version before Saunders began to market it and have found it to be a quality piece of equipment. It is the best way I have found to carry a big lens a long distance without killing yourself. I use it for my 600 F4. I can carry it with a body attached but the lens hood must be collapsed. As with any equipment it's not perfect. I would prefer the upper pockets to be padded and to have a better fastening system.

In the bottom pockets I can carry EOS 1's with booster and the 70-200 F2.8. The upper pockets hold mostly film and misc gear. You can lash the tripod to the pack for an extended hike and the entire package travels wellPaul Wilson , Sep 19, 1997; This might be a bit late for an answer but here goes: Before you spend $99 on a Scopepack, go to a good outdoor store and take a look at a real backpack. I use a Eureka Moab that's excellent. It has an internal frame, very comfortable harness and has a sleeve on either side that's perfect for carrying a tripod. Just stick two legs and the center column through the sleave and let the 3rd leg stay outside. It's the best solution I've seen for carrying a tripod short of the Super Trekker(in some ways it's better than that). Larger tripods might not fit the sleeve though. The pack I have should carry a 500/4 in a padded, nylon lens case(I believe Domke makes these) along with some other equipment. I just take the shoulder strap off a small camera bag and put the bag in the backpack.

For larger lenses like an 80-200/2.8, I put them in a lens case and put that in the pack.Paul M. Spatzek , Mar 25, 1998; I have not personally used the Scopepack my self but have several acqauintances that have used them. They all have the same problem. They love the utility of the system with all the pockets that allow carrying extra camera bodies, etc., but one thing they all agree on is that Quality of Construction is Not Very High! The typical point of failure is the straps attachment into the body of the pack pulls loose with long use. If reinforced by a competent upholstry shop or tailor shop, then it becomes a viable system. Just a thing to keep in mind. To me, the low cost of the pack sysstem allows one to spend 50 or so at the tailor's to end up with a system that works. For an alternative, look at the Kinesis System, but be warned it's double the price of the scopepack system. I have the Kinesis camera pack for my F3t with 80-200 2.8 Nikkor and it's a good system, but I bought it used from a friend who upgraded.